THE TOP 50.
2026 · Week 6 · Formula v2.0.0
Click “Why?” to see exactly how each team earned its place.
| RK | TEAM | W–L | SCORE | PREV | MOVE | AP | AP DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 |  Notre Dame FBS Independents | 6–0 | 97.34 | 3 | ↑ 2 | NR | — |
Notre Dame is #1 with a 6–0 record. Strength of record contributes 50.00 points to its 97.34 total. Its most valuable win is over Wisconsin (41–13), worth 1.77 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 87.6/100. Quality wins · 20% 99.3 / 100 +19.854 points Strength of schedule · 20% 87.6 / 100 +17.518 points Strength of record · 50% 100.0 / 100 +50.000 points Capped dominance · 5% 99.3 / 100 +4.964 points Loss quality · 5% 100.0 / 100 +5.000 points | |||||||
| 02 |  Alabama SEC | 5–1 | 97.55 | 1 | ↓ 1 | NR | — |
Alabama is #2 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 48.18 points to its 97.55 total. Its most valuable win is over Kentucky (45–17), worth 2.28 résumé units. Results is its lowest component at 83.3/100. Quality wins · 20% 100.0 / 100 +20.000 points Strength of schedule · 20% 100.0 / 100 +20.000 points Strength of record · 50% 96.4 / 100 +48.175 points Capped dominance · 5% 98.5 / 100 +4.927 points Loss quality · 5% 89.1 / 100 +4.453 points | |||||||
| 03 |  UCLA Big Ten | 5–0 | 95.15 | 6 | ↑ 3 | NR | — |
UCLA is #3 with a 5–0 record. Strength of record contributes 48.91 points to its 95.15 total. Its most valuable win is over Oregon (17–15), worth 1.58 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 85.4/100. Quality wins · 20% 97.1 / 100 +19.416 points Strength of schedule · 20% 85.4 / 100 +17.080 points Strength of record · 50% 97.8 / 100 +48.905 points Capped dominance · 5% 94.9 / 100 +4.745 points Loss quality · 5% 100.0 / 100 +5.000 points | |||||||
| 04 |  Miami ACC | 5–0 | 93.87 | 4 | — | NR | — |
Miami is #4 with a 5–0 record. Strength of record contributes 49.27 points to its 93.87 total. Its most valuable win is over Wake Forest (33–20), worth 1.91 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 75.2/100. Quality wins · 20% 97.8 / 100 +19.562 points Strength of schedule · 20% 75.2 / 100 +15.036 points Strength of record · 50% 98.5 / 100 +49.270 points Capped dominance · 5% 100.0 / 100 +5.000 points Loss quality · 5% 100.0 / 100 +5.000 points | |||||||
| 05 |  Texas SEC | 4–1 | 93.83 | 2 | ↓ 3 | NR | — |
Texas is #5 with a 4–1 record. Strength of record contributes 45.99 points to its 93.83 total. Its most valuable win is over UTSA (30–6), worth 1.66 résumé units. Road / neutral is its lowest component at 63.1/100. Quality wins · 20% 98.5 / 100 +19.708 points Strength of schedule · 20% 99.3 / 100 +19.854 points Strength of record · 50% 92.0 / 100 +45.985 points Capped dominance · 5% 83.2 / 100 +4.161 points Loss quality · 5% 82.5 / 100 +4.124 points | |||||||
| 06 |  Georgia SEC | 6–0 | 92.81 | 24 | ↑ 18 | NR | — |
Georgia is #6 with a 6–0 record. Strength of record contributes 49.64 points to its 92.81 total. Its most valuable win is over Alabama (20–17), worth 2.28 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 70.1/100. Quality wins · 20% 96.4 / 100 +19.270 points Strength of schedule · 20% 70.1 / 100 +14.015 points Strength of record · 50% 99.3 / 100 +49.635 points Capped dominance · 5% 97.8 / 100 +4.891 points Loss quality · 5% 100.0 / 100 +5.000 points | |||||||
| 07 | 4–1 | 92.66 | 5 | ↓ 2 | NR | — | |
Mississippi State is #7 with a 4–1 record. Strength of record contributes 46.35 points to its 92.66 total. Its most valuable win is over Missouri (31–24), worth 1.74 résumé units. Capped dominance is its lowest component at 75.9/100. Quality wins · 20% 95.6 / 100 +19.124 points Strength of schedule · 20% 97.8 / 100 +19.562 points Strength of record · 50% 92.7 / 100 +46.350 points Capped dominance · 5% 75.9 / 100 +3.796 points Loss quality · 5% 76.6 / 100 +3.832 points | |||||||
| 08 |  Kentucky SEC | 5–1 | 90.44 | 14 | ↑ 6 | NR | — |
Kentucky is #8 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 46.72 points to its 90.44 total. Its most valuable win is over LSU (35–34), worth 1.40 résumé units. Capped dominance is its lowest component at 68.6/100. Quality wins · 20% 91.2 / 100 +18.248 points Strength of schedule · 20% 91.2 / 100 +18.248 points Strength of record · 50% 93.4 / 100 +46.715 points Capped dominance · 5% 68.6 / 100 +3.431 points Loss quality · 5% 75.9 / 100 +3.796 points | |||||||
| 09 |  Indiana Big Ten | 6–0 | 88.47 | 27 | ↑ 18 | NR | — |
Indiana is #9 with a 6–0 record. Strength of record contributes 48.54 points to its 88.47 total. Its most valuable win is over Nebraska (20–17), worth 1.79 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 56.2/100. Quality wins · 20% 94.9 / 100 +18.978 points Strength of schedule · 20% 56.2 / 100 +11.241 points Strength of record · 50% 97.1 / 100 +48.540 points Capped dominance · 5% 94.2 / 100 +4.708 points Loss quality · 5% 100.0 / 100 +5.000 points | |||||||
| 10 |  Wake Forest ACC | 5–1 | 88.25 | 17 | ↑ 7 | NR | — |
Wake Forest is #10 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 45.26 points to its 88.25 total. Its most valuable win is over Purdue (38–36), worth 1.28 résumé units. Capped dominance is its lowest component at 80.3/100. Quality wins · 20% 90.5 / 100 +18.102 points Strength of schedule · 20% 83.9 / 100 +16.788 points Strength of record · 50% 90.5 / 100 +45.255 points Capped dominance · 5% 80.3 / 100 +4.015 points Loss quality · 5% 81.8 / 100 +4.088 points | |||||||
| 11 |  BYU Big 12 | 5–0 | 86.35 | 19 | ↑ 8 | NR | — |
BYU is #11 with a 5–0 record. Strength of record contributes 47.45 points to its 86.35 total. Its most valuable win is over Arizona (28–17), worth 1.52 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 53.3/100. Quality wins · 20% 93.4 / 100 +18.686 points Strength of schedule · 20% 53.3 / 100 +10.657 points Strength of record · 50% 94.9 / 100 +47.445 points Capped dominance · 5% 91.2 / 100 +4.562 points Loss quality · 5% 100.0 / 100 +5.000 points | |||||||
| 12 |  Boise State Pac-12 | 5–1 | 87.23 | 22 | ↑ 10 | NR | — |
Boise State is #12 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 44.89 points to its 87.23 total. Its most valuable win is over Memphis (38–20), worth 1.54 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 75.9/100. Quality wins · 20% 92.7 / 100 +18.540 points Strength of schedule · 20% 75.9 / 100 +15.182 points Strength of record · 50% 89.8 / 100 +44.891 points Capped dominance · 5% 85.4 / 100 +4.270 points Loss quality · 5% 86.9 / 100 +4.343 points | |||||||
| 13 |  Ohio State Big Ten | 5–1 | 86.86 | 8 | ↓ 5 | NR | — |
Ohio State is #13 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 44.53 points to its 86.86 total. Its most valuable win is over Iowa (31–14), worth 1.95 résumé units. Road / neutral is its lowest component at 63.1/100. Quality wins · 20% 89.8 / 100 +17.956 points Strength of schedule · 20% 74.5 / 100 +14.891 points Strength of record · 50% 89.1 / 100 +44.526 points Capped dominance · 5% 96.4 / 100 +4.818 points Loss quality · 5% 93.4 / 100 +4.672 points | |||||||
| 14 |  Texas Tech Big 12 | 5–0 | 85.66 | 12 | ↓ 2 | NR | — |
Texas Tech is #14 with a 5–0 record. Strength of record contributes 47.81 points to its 85.66 total. Its most valuable win is over Houston (28–26), worth 1.67 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 46.7/100. Quality wins · 20% 94.2 / 100 +18.832 points Strength of schedule · 20% 46.7 / 100 +9.343 points Strength of record · 50% 95.6 / 100 +47.810 points Capped dominance · 5% 93.4 / 100 +4.672 points Loss quality · 5% 100.0 / 100 +5.000 points | |||||||
| 15 |  Ole Miss SEC | 4–1 | 85.91 | 18 | ↑ 3 | NR | — |
Ole Miss is #15 with a 4–1 record. Strength of record contributes 43.07 points to its 85.91 total. Its most valuable win is over LSU (32–24), worth 1.50 résumé units. Capped dominance is its lowest component at 71.5/100. Quality wins · 20% 92.0 / 100 +18.394 points Strength of schedule · 20% 84.7 / 100 +16.934 points Strength of record · 50% 86.1 / 100 +43.066 points Capped dominance · 5% 71.5 / 100 +3.577 points Loss quality · 5% 78.8 / 100 +3.942 points | |||||||
| 16 |  Houston Big 12 | 5–1 | 83.61 | 21 | ↑ 5 | NR | — |
Houston is #16 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 44.16 points to its 83.61 total. Its most valuable win is over Kansas State (35–16), worth 1.23 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 69.3/100. Quality wins · 20% 83.2 / 100 +16.642 points Strength of schedule · 20% 69.3 / 100 +13.869 points Strength of record · 50% 88.3 / 100 +44.161 points Capped dominance · 5% 86.1 / 100 +4.307 points Loss quality · 5% 92.7 / 100 +4.635 points | |||||||
| 17 |  Missouri SEC | 5–1 | 84.34 | 15 | ↓ 2 | NR | — |
Missouri is #17 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 43.80 points to its 84.34 total. Its most valuable win is over Florida (45–17), worth 1.59 résumé units. Road / neutral is its lowest component at 63.1/100. Quality wins · 20% 84.7 / 100 +16.934 points Strength of schedule · 20% 72.3 / 100 +14.453 points Strength of record · 50% 87.6 / 100 +43.796 points Capped dominance · 5% 92.7 / 100 +4.635 points Loss quality · 5% 90.5 / 100 +4.526 points | |||||||
| 18 |  Oregon Big Ten | 3–2 | 83.54 | 9 | ↓ 9 | NR | — |
Oregon is #18 with a 3–2 record. Strength of record contributes 39.05 points to its 83.54 total. Its most valuable win is over USC (41–27), worth 2.01 résumé units. Results is its lowest component at 60.0/100. Quality wins · 20% 89.1 / 100 +17.810 points Strength of schedule · 20% 97.1 / 100 +19.416 points Strength of record · 50% 78.1 / 100 +39.051 points Capped dominance · 5% 75.2 / 100 +3.759 points Loss quality · 5% 70.1 / 100 +3.504 points | |||||||
| 19 |  USC Big Ten | 6–1 | 83.03 | 10 | ↓ 9 | NR | — |
USC is #19 with a 6–1 record. Strength of record contributes 43.43 points to its 83.03 total. Its most valuable win is over Fresno State (39–0), worth 1.19 résumé units. Loss quality is its lowest component at 72.3/100. Quality wins · 20% 87.6 / 100 +17.518 points Strength of schedule · 20% 73.0 / 100 +14.599 points Strength of record · 50% 86.9 / 100 +43.431 points Capped dominance · 5% 77.4 / 100 +3.869 points Loss quality · 5% 72.3 / 100 +3.613 points | |||||||
| 20 |  Florida SEC | 4–2 | 81.46 | 7 | ↓ 13 | NR | — |
Florida is #20 with a 4–2 record. Strength of record contributes 39.42 points to its 81.46 total. Its most valuable win is over Ole Miss (52–28), worth 1.80 résumé units. Loss quality is its lowest component at 52.6/100. Quality wins · 20% 88.3 / 100 +17.664 points Strength of schedule · 20% 92.0 / 100 +18.394 points Strength of record · 50% 78.8 / 100 +39.416 points Capped dominance · 5% 67.2 / 100 +3.358 points Loss quality · 5% 52.6 / 100 +2.628 points | |||||||
| 21 |  Oklahoma SEC | 3–2 | 81.24 | 47 | ↑ 26 | NR | — |
Oklahoma is #21 with a 3–2 record. Strength of record contributes 38.32 points to its 81.24 total. Its most valuable win is over Texas (27–24), worth 2.13 résumé units. Road / neutral is its lowest component at 38.7/100. Quality wins · 20% 86.9 / 100 +17.372 points Strength of schedule · 20% 98.5 / 100 +19.708 points Strength of record · 50% 76.6 / 100 +38.321 points Capped dominance · 5% 47.4 / 100 +2.372 points Loss quality · 5% 69.3 / 100 +3.467 points | |||||||
| 22 |  Nebraska Big Ten | 5–1 | 79.42 | 13 | ↓ 9 | NR | — |
Nebraska is #22 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 40.88 points to its 79.42 total. Its most valuable win is over Ohio (49–21), worth 1.26 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 65.7/100. Quality wins · 20% 81.0 / 100 +16.204 points Strength of schedule · 20% 65.7 / 100 +13.139 points Strength of record · 50% 81.8 / 100 +40.876 points Capped dominance · 5% 95.6 / 100 +4.781 points Loss quality · 5% 88.3 / 100 +4.416 points | |||||||
| 23 |  LSU SEC | 4–2 | 80.29 | 23 | — | NR | — |
LSU is #23 with a 4–2 record. Strength of record contributes 37.96 points to its 80.29 total. Its most valuable win is over Clemson (51–10), worth 1.51 résumé units. Road / neutral is its lowest component at 19.0/100. Quality wins · 20% 78.8 / 100 +15.766 points Strength of schedule · 20% 92.7 / 100 +18.540 points Strength of record · 50% 75.9 / 100 +37.956 points Capped dominance · 5% 89.8 / 100 +4.489 points Loss quality · 5% 70.8 / 100 +3.540 points | |||||||
| 24 |  Utah Big 12 | 5–0 | 78.10 | 25 | ↑ 1 | NR | — |
Utah is #24 with a 5–0 record. Strength of record contributes 45.62 points to its 78.10 total. Its most valuable win is over Iowa State (31–17), worth 1.24 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 27.7/100. Quality wins · 20% 85.4 / 100 +17.080 points Strength of schedule · 20% 27.7 / 100 +5.547 points Strength of record · 50% 91.2 / 100 +45.620 points Capped dominance · 5% 97.1 / 100 +4.854 points Loss quality · 5% 100.0 / 100 +5.000 points | |||||||
| 25 |  Iowa Big Ten | 5–1 | 78.69 | 32 | ↑ 7 | NR | — |
Iowa is #25 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 42.34 points to its 78.69 total. Its most valuable win is over Michigan (20–19), worth 1.35 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 63.5/100. Quality wins · 20% 81.8 / 100 +16.350 points Strength of schedule · 20% 63.5 / 100 +12.701 points Strength of record · 50% 84.7 / 100 +42.336 points Capped dominance · 5% 73.0 / 100 +3.650 points Loss quality · 5% 73.0 / 100 +3.650 points | |||||||
| 26 |  James Madison Sun Belt | 6–0 | 76.86 | 20 | ↓ 6 | NR | — |
James Madison is #26 with a 6–0 record. Strength of record contributes 47.08 points to its 76.86 total. Its most valuable win is over Liberty (20–13), worth 1.18 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 18.2/100. Quality wins · 20% 83.9 / 100 +16.788 points Strength of schedule · 20% 18.2 / 100 +3.650 points Strength of record · 50% 94.2 / 100 +47.080 points Capped dominance · 5% 86.9 / 100 +4.343 points Loss quality · 5% 100.0 / 100 +5.000 points | |||||||
| 27 |  Arizona Big 12 | 5–1 | 76.17 | 34 | ↑ 7 | NR | — |
Arizona is #27 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 42.70 points to its 76.17 total. Its most valuable win is over Cincinnati (34–7), worth 1.60 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 42.3/100. Quality wins · 20% 80.3 / 100 +16.058 points Strength of schedule · 20% 42.3 / 100 +8.467 points Strength of record · 50% 85.4 / 100 +42.701 points Capped dominance · 5% 89.1 / 100 +4.453 points Loss quality · 5% 89.8 / 100 +4.489 points | |||||||
| 28 |  Wisconsin Big Ten | 4–1 | 76.24 | 16 | ↓ 12 | NR | — |
Wisconsin is #28 with a 4–1 record. Strength of record contributes 40.15 points to its 76.24 total. Its most valuable win is over Penn State (24–20), worth 1.10 résumé units. Road / neutral is its lowest component at 63.1/100. Quality wins · 20% 73.0 / 100 +14.599 points Strength of schedule · 20% 67.2 / 100 +13.431 points Strength of record · 50% 80.3 / 100 +40.146 points Capped dominance · 5% 78.1 / 100 +3.905 points Loss quality · 5% 83.2 / 100 +4.161 points | |||||||
| 29 |  Clemson ACC | 3–2 | 75.58 | 37 | ↑ 8 | NR | — |
Clemson is #29 with a 3–2 record. Strength of record contributes 36.13 points to its 75.58 total. Its most valuable win is over North Carolina (28–20), worth 1.30 résumé units. Capped dominance is its lowest component at 38.7/100. Quality wins · 20% 77.4 / 100 +15.474 points Strength of schedule · 20% 96.4 / 100 +19.270 points Strength of record · 50% 72.3 / 100 +36.131 points Capped dominance · 5% 38.7 / 100 +1.934 points Loss quality · 5% 55.5 / 100 +2.774 points | |||||||
| 30 |  North Dakota State Mountain West | 5–1 | 73.21 | 26 | ↓ 4 | NR | — |
North Dakota State is #30 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 41.24 points to its 73.21 total. Its most valuable win is over Air Force (38–32), worth 1.51 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 34.3/100. Quality wins · 20% 82.5 / 100 +16.496 points Strength of schedule · 20% 34.3 / 100 +6.861 points Strength of record · 50% 82.5 / 100 +41.241 points Capped dominance · 5% 87.6 / 100 +4.380 points Loss quality · 5% 84.7 / 100 +4.234 points | |||||||
| 31 |  Oklahoma State Big 12 | 4–1 | 73.47 | 30 | ↓ 1 | NR | — |
Oklahoma State is #31 with a 4–1 record. Strength of record contributes 39.78 points to its 73.47 total. Its most valuable win is over Oregon (39–31), worth 1.56 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 45.3/100. Quality wins · 20% 86.1 / 100 +17.226 points Strength of schedule · 20% 45.3 / 100 +9.051 points Strength of record · 50% 79.6 / 100 +39.781 points Capped dominance · 5% 76.6 / 100 +3.832 points Loss quality · 5% 71.5 / 100 +3.577 points | |||||||
| 32 |  UTSA American Athletic | 5–1 | 72.26 | 35 | ↑ 3 | NR | — |
UTSA is #32 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 41.97 points to its 72.26 total. Its most valuable win is over South Florida (31–24), worth 1.04 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 43.8/100. Quality wins · 20% 71.5 / 100 +14.307 points Strength of schedule · 20% 43.8 / 100 +8.759 points Strength of record · 50% 83.9 / 100 +41.971 points Capped dominance · 5% 59.1 / 100 +2.956 points Loss quality · 5% 85.4 / 100 +4.270 points | |||||||
| 33 |  Tennessee SEC | 5–1 | 72.26 | 38 | ↑ 5 | NR | — |
Tennessee is #33 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 40.51 points to its 72.26 total. Its most valuable win is over Auburn (24–14), worth 1.24 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 39.4/100. Quality wins · 20% 76.6 / 100 +15.328 points Strength of schedule · 20% 39.4 / 100 +7.883 points Strength of record · 50% 81.0 / 100 +40.511 points Capped dominance · 5% 84.7 / 100 +4.234 points Loss quality · 5% 86.1 / 100 +4.307 points | |||||||
| 34 |  Baylor Big 12 | 4–1 | 72.04 | 40 | ↑ 6 | NR | — |
Baylor is #34 with a 4–1 record. Strength of record contributes 37.59 points to its 72.04 total. Its most valuable win is over Louisiana Tech (36–19), worth 1.23 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 50.4/100. Quality wins · 20% 79.6 / 100 +15.912 points Strength of schedule · 20% 50.4 / 100 +10.073 points Strength of record · 50% 75.2 / 100 +37.591 points Capped dominance · 5% 88.3 / 100 +4.416 points Loss quality · 5% 81.0 / 100 +4.051 points | |||||||
| 35 | 3–2 | 72.37 | 73 | ↑ 38 | NR | — | |
North Carolina is #35 with a 3–2 record. Strength of record contributes 35.04 points to its 72.37 total. Its most valuable win is over Pittsburgh (21–17), worth 1.80 résumé units. Capped dominance is its lowest component at 51.1/100. Quality wins · 20% 70.8 / 100 +14.161 points Strength of schedule · 20% 86.1 / 100 +17.226 points Strength of record · 50% 70.1 / 100 +35.036 points Capped dominance · 5% 51.1 / 100 +2.555 points Loss quality · 5% 67.9 / 100 +3.394 points | |||||||
| 36 |  Memphis American Athletic | 5–1 | 70.88 | 41 | ↑ 5 | NR | — |
Memphis is #36 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 41.61 points to its 70.88 total. Its most valuable win is over UNLV (27–21), worth 1.39 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 29.9/100. Quality wins · 20% 74.5 / 100 +14.891 points Strength of schedule · 20% 29.9 / 100 +5.985 points Strength of record · 50% 83.2 / 100 +41.606 points Capped dominance · 5% 83.9 / 100 +4.197 points Loss quality · 5% 83.9 / 100 +4.197 points | |||||||
| 37 |  Auburn SEC | 3–2 | 71.02 | 33 | ↓ 4 | NR | — |
Auburn is #37 with a 3–2 record. Strength of record contributes 32.12 points to its 71.02 total. Its most valuable win is over Baylor (17–16), worth 1.64 résumé units. Road / neutral is its lowest component at 40.5/100. Quality wins · 20% 75.2 / 100 +15.036 points Strength of schedule · 20% 89.8 / 100 +17.956 points Strength of record · 50% 64.2 / 100 +32.117 points Capped dominance · 5% 55.5 / 100 +2.774 points Loss quality · 5% 62.8 / 100 +3.139 points | |||||||
| 38 |  Pittsburgh ACC | 5–1 | 69.82 | 11 | ↓ 27 | NR | — |
Pittsburgh is #38 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 38.69 points to its 69.82 total. Its most valuable win is over Virginia Tech (35–33), worth 1.17 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 41.6/100. Quality wins · 20% 75.9 / 100 +15.182 points Strength of schedule · 20% 41.6 / 100 +8.321 points Strength of record · 50% 77.4 / 100 +38.686 points Capped dominance · 5% 78.8 / 100 +3.942 points Loss quality · 5% 73.7 / 100 +3.686 points | |||||||
| 39 |  Michigan Big Ten | 3–2 | 70.11 | 44 | ↑ 5 | NR | — |
Michigan is #39 with a 3–2 record. Strength of record contributes 30.66 points to its 70.11 total. Its most valuable win is over Oklahoma (17–10), worth 1.47 résumé units. Road / neutral is its lowest component at 19.0/100. Quality wins · 20% 73.7 / 100 +14.745 points Strength of schedule · 20% 90.5 / 100 +18.102 points Strength of record · 50% 61.3 / 100 +30.657 points Capped dominance · 5% 65.7 / 100 +3.285 points Loss quality · 5% 66.4 / 100 +3.321 points | |||||||
| 40 |  Northwestern Big Ten | 4–1 | 68.10 | 36 | ↓ 4 | NR | — |
Northwestern is #40 with a 4–1 record. Strength of record contributes 36.86 points to its 68.10 total. Its most valuable win is over Penn State (34–13), worth 1.08 résumé units. Road / neutral is its lowest component at 19.0/100. Quality wins · 20% 70.1 / 100 +14.015 points Strength of schedule · 20% 40.1 / 100 +8.029 points Strength of record · 50% 73.7 / 100 +36.861 points Capped dominance · 5% 92.0 / 100 +4.599 points Loss quality · 5% 92.0 / 100 +4.599 points | |||||||
| 41 |  UNLV Mountain West | 4–2 | 67.99 | 68 | ↑ 27 | NR | — |
UNLV is #41 with a 4–2 record. Strength of record contributes 33.21 points to its 67.99 total. Its most valuable win is over North Dakota State (13–7), worth 1.53 résumé units. Loss quality is its lowest component at 54.7/100. Quality wins · 20% 78.1 / 100 +15.620 points Strength of schedule · 20% 67.9 / 100 +13.577 points Strength of record · 50% 66.4 / 100 +33.212 points Capped dominance · 5% 56.9 / 100 +2.847 points Loss quality · 5% 54.7 / 100 +2.737 points | |||||||
| 42 |  Cincinnati Big 12 | 4–1 | 65.18 | 39 | ↓ 3 | NR | — |
Cincinnati is #42 with a 4–1 record. Strength of record contributes 36.50 points to its 65.18 total. Its most valuable win is over Kansas State (31–26), worth 0.93 résumé units. Road / neutral is its lowest component at 19.0/100. Quality wins · 20% 68.6 / 100 +13.723 points Strength of schedule · 20% 38.7 / 100 +7.737 points Strength of record · 50% 73.0 / 100 +36.496 points Capped dominance · 5% 64.2 / 100 +3.212 points Loss quality · 5% 80.3 / 100 +4.015 points | |||||||
| 43 |  Purdue Big Ten | 3–3 | 66.13 | 70 | ↑ 27 | NR | — |
Purdue is #43 with a 3–3 record. Strength of record contributes 30.29 points to its 66.13 total. Its most valuable win is over Minnesota (41–13), worth 1.37 résumé units. Loss quality is its lowest component at 46.0/100. Quality wins · 20% 59.9 / 100 +11.971 points Strength of schedule · 20% 94.2 / 100 +18.832 points Strength of record · 50% 60.6 / 100 +30.292 points Capped dominance · 5% 54.7 / 100 +2.737 points Loss quality · 5% 46.0 / 100 +2.299 points | |||||||
| 44 | 3–3 | 64.85 | 78 | ↑ 34 | NR | — | |
South Carolina is #44 with a 3–3 record. Strength of record contributes 28.10 points to its 64.85 total. Its most valuable win is over Florida (38–19), worth 1.88 résumé units. Loss quality is its lowest component at 46.7/100. Quality wins · 20% 61.3 / 100 +12.263 points Strength of schedule · 20% 93.4 / 100 +18.686 points Strength of record · 50% 56.2 / 100 +28.102 points Capped dominance · 5% 69.3 / 100 +3.467 points Loss quality · 5% 46.7 / 100 +2.336 points | |||||||
| 45 |  Oregon State Pac-12 | 4–2 | 63.69 | 52 | ↑ 7 | NR | — |
Oregon State is #45 with a 4–2 record. Strength of record contributes 33.58 points to its 63.69 total. Its most valuable win is over Colorado State (56–26), worth 1.13 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 49.6/100. Quality wins · 20% 64.2 / 100 +12.847 points Strength of schedule · 20% 49.6 / 100 +9.927 points Strength of record · 50% 67.2 / 100 +33.577 points Capped dominance · 5% 79.6 / 100 +3.978 points Loss quality · 5% 67.2 / 100 +3.358 points | |||||||
| 46 |  Minnesota Big Ten | 4–2 | 62.88 | 31 | ↓ 15 | NR | — |
Minnesota is #46 with a 4–2 record. Strength of record contributes 32.85 points to its 62.88 total. Its most valuable win is over Michigan (20–14), worth 1.27 résumé units. Capped dominance is its lowest component at 42.3/100. Quality wins · 20% 67.9 / 100 +13.577 points Strength of schedule · 20% 58.4 / 100 +11.679 points Strength of record · 50% 65.7 / 100 +32.847 points Capped dominance · 5% 42.3 / 100 +2.117 points Loss quality · 5% 53.3 / 100 +2.664 points | |||||||
| 47 |  Liberty Conference USA | 5–1 | 59.56 | 59 | ↑ 12 | NR | — |
Liberty is #47 with a 5–1 record. Strength of record contributes 37.23 points to its 59.56 total. Its most valuable win is over Delaware (30–14), worth 0.85 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 5.1/100. Quality wins · 20% 63.5 / 100 +12.701 points Strength of schedule · 20% 5.1 / 100 +1.022 points Strength of record · 50% 74.5 / 100 +37.226 points Capped dominance · 5% 81.0 / 100 +4.051 points Loss quality · 5% 91.2 / 100 +4.562 points | |||||||
| 48 |  Florida Atlantic American Athletic | 4–1 | 60.07 | 54 | ↑ 6 | NR | — |
Florida Atlantic is #48 with a 4–1 record. Strength of record contributes 35.77 points to its 60.07 total. Its most valuable win is over Florida International (16–10), worth 0.85 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 19.7/100. Quality wins · 20% 65.0 / 100 +12.993 points Strength of schedule · 20% 19.7 / 100 +3.942 points Strength of record · 50% 71.5 / 100 +35.766 points Capped dominance · 5% 67.9 / 100 +3.394 points Loss quality · 5% 79.6 / 100 +3.978 points | |||||||
| 49 |  Air Force Mountain West | 4–1 | 59.93 | 67 | ↑ 18 | NR | — |
Air Force is #49 with a 4–1 record. Strength of record contributes 35.40 points to its 59.93 total. Its most valuable win is over Nevada (36–33), worth 0.89 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 17.5/100. Quality wins · 20% 67.2 / 100 +13.431 points Strength of schedule · 20% 17.5 / 100 +3.504 points Strength of record · 50% 70.8 / 100 +35.401 points Capped dominance · 5% 74.5 / 100 +3.723 points Loss quality · 5% 77.4 / 100 +3.869 points | |||||||
| 50 |  Duke ACC | 4–1 | 59.85 | 28 | ↓ 22 | NR | — |
Duke is #50 with a 4–1 record. Strength of record contributes 34.67 points to its 59.85 total. Its most valuable win is over Illinois (31–27), worth 1.05 résumé units. Strength of schedule is its lowest component at 14.6/100. Quality wins · 20% 72.3 / 100 +14.453 points Strength of schedule · 20% 14.6 / 100 +2.920 points Strength of record · 50% 69.3 / 100 +34.672 points Capped dominance · 5% 81.8 / 100 +4.088 points Loss quality · 5% 74.5 / 100 +3.723 points | |||||||
INPUT SHA-256: 8d06f2c86c14a8e3e6690db933f973487d6a2c2507d8684394a9c6399091fda5
Download all teams and reproducible inputs ↗